5 cave explorers are trapped; the survival rate is slim, and when they are rescued, only 4 come out. The case is brought before a fictional court where 5 justices offer a range of interpretations on whether the defendants should be punished. Their opinions highlight different legal philosophies such as strict 'interpretation of the law', 'natural law theory', and 'the difference between legal and moral considerations'.
What is right, and what is wrong? Find out more on this second episode of Justice Unraveled.
